With egg-laying hens in cages less than the size of an 8-1/2″ x 11″ piece of paper and veal calves in 22″ x 54″ crates that don’t allow them to turn around (which is the intended purpose—along with an iron-deficient diet, their muscles don’t have a chance to develop, creating the desired texture in the final product), just about any additional space is a step forward.

Of course, the hens will still be kept in cages, so the “cage-free” term is still a myth, but for the chickens it’s a certain sign of a positive future.

Barilla pasta will switch 45 percent of the eggs it uses to cage-free by the end of the year, according to the Humane Society. Barilla is the world’s largest pasta maker, and the transition will make it the first pasta company to join the growing cage-free movement.

Some facts:

• U.S. factory farms confine about 280 million hens in cages so small, they can’t even spread their wings. Extensive scientific research confirms this causes suffering.
• Cage-free hens generally have two to three times more space per bird than caged hens.
• Cage-free hens may not be able to go outside and, like caged hens, may have parts of their beaks cut off, but they can walk, spread their wings and lay their eggs in     nests–all behaviors permanently denied to hens crammed into cages.
• Factory farming is a major social issue: A study by food industry consultancy, Technomic, ranked animal welfare as the third-most important social issue to restaurant patrons; an American Farm Bureau-funded report found that 89 percent of Americans believe that food companies that require their suppliers to treat farm animals better are doing the right thing.

Although “cage-free” and “free range” can be meaningless and not as cruelty-free as they sound, it’s a step in the right direction.

Related posts:

1. Does Cruelty Free Mean Animal Free?
2. Meat Free Monday
3. Calcium Rich And Dairy Free

The same year, Luzhkov’s deputy Pavel Biryukov offered to replace the program of sterilization of homeless animals to their extermination in municipal shelters. The black list included quarantined and sterilized dogs. Animal rights activists said that such a change in the law would only legalize animal slaughter.

There is direct connection between the cultural and moral level of the society and the attention that it pays to issues of protection of animals. The culture of eating dog meat has been prospering in Moscow lately. A journalistic investigation conducted by one of Russian TV channels revealed a whole chain of restaurants serving dog meat in the south-west of Moscow.

The attitude of the Russian Orthodox Church to four-legged creatures is terrible too. On October 27, 2007, a priest of Russia’s iconic Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius ordered to pack over 30 cats in sacks and take them to a landfill where they were bulldozed.

During the festival of balloons held in Moscow’s Tushino in 2008, several lambs were publicly slaughtered for meat. The festival was conducted with the blessing of the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia.

In 2007, a priest of the Temple of St. Matrona in Moscow’s center ordered a security guard to beat a puppy who ran onto the territory of the church. The guard broke the puppy’s spine.

Atrocious attitude to animals prospers in Ukraine too. Ukrainian animal rights activists won the support of UEFA after their numerous attempts to reach the national authorities had been left without attention. In Ukraine, homeless animals are destroyed barbarically. Dog catchers use special syringe guns to kill homeless pets. The poison that they used is called ditiline - a drug that paralyzes respiratory muscles.

In Ukraine’s Lisichansk, local authorities purchased a mobile crematorium for 198,000 hryvnas. It looks like a field kitchen with a chimney. The crematorium is operated by a driver, an operator and a catcher “armed” with a syringe gun. They paralyze animals and throw them into the container. As soon as they collect 40 kilos, they burn the paralyzed dogs and cats while they are still alive.

Last year, the Ukrainian president, the prime minister and the opposition leader received dozens of letters from foreign animal rights activities, who urged them to immediately stop the uncontrollable and brutal extermination of homeless animals. Activists from other countries sent many similar messages to UEFA headquarters because Ukraine is hosting Euro 2012 football championship.

Europe is ready to boycott Euro 2012 in Ukraine. Activists, with famous people among them, are ready to organize meetings of protest near Ukrainian embassies in EU countries if nothing changes for the better.

Director of Euro 2012, Martin Cullen, told Ukrainian officials that he condemned barbaric methods of solving the problem with homeless pets. The official stated that the government of Ukraine should take the problem under control because the brutal methods used against the animals contradict to European norms.

Related posts:

1. Heaven for Homeless Cats
2. Robert Is Retired
3. Peta Kills Animals

Days after the cruelty was captured on video, the starving mountain bear was dead – only to be replaced by another in Gabala, northern Azerbaijan, reports the Sun.

The eaterie’s owner told sickened Daryl Willard, 27: “We just catch a new one up in the mountains.”

Daryl, of Tunbridge Wells, Kent, told how he was working in the former Soviet republic as a sports trainer when he stopped at the café last month.

He said: “People cheered and shouted as they watched the starving bear drink from the cola bottle and eat sandwich leftovers they threw. A few days after it died, there was a new one.”

The International Fund for Animal Welfare and the Born Free charity branded it “shocking” and “a disgrace”.

TV’s animal expert Terry Nutkins said: “It’s unbelievable cruelty.”

Azerbaijan‘s embassy here said the mistreatment was an “isolated case”.

Related posts:

1. Woman Was Butchered By A Bear While She Was Feeding Him
2. Copenhagen Ice Bear For COP 15
3. Kung Fu Bear, Beat That Bruce Lee

The review by Bristol University’s Professor Mike Mendl and Dr Liz Paul and Lincoln University’s Dr Oliver Burman, is published online in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

An animal living in a world where it is regularly threatened by predators will develop a negative emotion or ‘mood’, such as anxietyanimal feel, whereas one in an environment with plenty of opportunities to acquire resources for survival will be in a more positive mood state.

The researchers argue that these emotional states not only reflect the animal’s experiences, they also help it decide how to make choices, especially in ambiguous situations, which could have good or bad outcomes. An animal in a negative state will benefit from adopting a safety-first, ‘pessimistic’ response to an ambiguous event — for example interpreting a rustle in the grass as signaling a predator – while an animal in a positive state will benefit from a more ‘optimistic’ response, interpreting it as signaling prey.

Professor Mike Mendl, Head of the Animal Welfare and Behavior research group at Bristol University’s School of Clinical Veterinary Science, said: “Because we can measure animal choices objectively, we can use ‘optimistic’ and ‘pessimistic’ decision-making as an indicator of the animal’s emotional state which itself is much more difficult to assess. Recent studies by our group and others suggest that this may be a valuable new approach in a variety of animal species.

“Public interest in animal welfare remains high, with widespread implications for the way in which animals are treated, used and included in society. We believe our approach could help us to better understand and assess an animal’s emotion.”

Related posts:

1. No More Animal Cruelty Videos?
2. International Day Of Animal Rights
3. There Are Animal Victims Too

Yet, one thing is clear the fragile ecosystem of the Gulf of Mexico is at great risk. Adding to the tragedy is that this is an incredibly vital area-and an incredibly vital time of year-for countless numbers of species that come for refuge to this specific stretch of the country to breed, nest, spawn, feed, and rest during migration. Peak migration and breeding times are late-April through mid-May. It really could not be worse timing.

1. Nesting and Migrating Shore Birds
Shorebirds such as plovers, sandpipers and oystercatchers are nesting or preparing to nest on beaches and barrier islands in Louisiana. Those that build their nests on the ground and feed on invertebrates are vulnerable to oil coming ashore.

2. Migrating Songbirds
We may not associate songbirds with the gulf shore, but migratory songbirds-warblers, orioles, buntings, flycatchers, swallows, hummingbirds and others-fly across the Gulf from the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico and rest and feed in the spill area. The non-stop journey across 500 miles of open water tests their endurance to its limits, and they rely on clear skies and healthy habitats on both sides of the Gulf in order to survive their journey.

3. Brown Pelicans
The brown pelican has not had an easy time of it. The gracefully gangling birds were only removed from the endangered species list last year, and there is a major population, around 34, 000 of them, currently nesting in the Gulf at the Breton National Wildlife Refuge-they are facing serious threat.

4. Sea Turtles
Of the seven remaining species of sea turtles known today, five of those species are in the Gulf. The oil spill area is one of the only foraging grounds for the most endangered species of the bunch, the Kemp’s ridley turtle, which is in its peak nesting season. One of its two primary migration routes runs south of Mississippi. Loggerhead turtles, also endangered, feed in the warm waters in the Gulf between May and October.

5. Whales and Dolphins
A total of 21 whale and dolphin species that routinely inhabit the northern Gulf are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and two whale species may be in the area of the spill: Bryde’s whales and endangered sperm whales, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The greatest threat is if whales get oil in the filtering structure in their mouths, which could lead to starvation and death, notes the The New York Times.

6. Manatees
Manatees are beginning to spread out along their full range of summer habitat in the Gulf, making them vulnerable to contaminated waters. According to the EPA publication, Wildlife And Oil Spills, manatees may be affected by inhaling volatile hydrocarbons while they are breathing on the surface, and it is very likely that exposure to petroleum would irritate sensitive mucous membranes and eyes. As with most animals, the young are the most at risk.

7. Fish, Shellfish and Crabs
According to The New York Times, the delta estuary is also the breeding ground for a lot of fish, shellfish and crabs, says LuAnn White, director of Tulane University’s Center for Applied Environmental Public Health. “All of those are at risk for being damaged,” she said. “That estuary area is responsible for the breeding for about 40 percent of the aquatic life that’s in the Gulf, [so] you could be affected not only the wildlife that lives in that area, but the whole Gulf.”

8. Gulf Sturgeon
Gulf sturgeon are gathering in coastal areas preparing to migrate upstream to spawn-oil reaching their congregation areas could be disastrous for the fish. At the turn of the 1900s, sturgeons in North American waters were heavily fished for their flesh and caviar. The gulf sturgeon was fished off Florida from 1887-1985 with a peak harvest at the turn of the 20th century

9. North Atlantic Bluefin Tuna
Unfortunately for the North Atlantic bluefin tuna, their meat is regarded as exceedingly delicious and overfishing throughout their range has driven their numbers to extremely low levels. Critically endangered (according to the IUCN Red List), their stocks have already fallen about 90 percent since the 1970s.

10.Humans
Yes,  we are like animals, and our existence is fragile and very dependable on well-being of the flora and the fauna.

Related posts:

1. US Army Has A Contingency Plan For Gulf Oil Spill
2. Peta Kills Animals
3. It’s Official: Pollution Turns Animals Into Mutants

Wool

It may come from a sheep, goat, or Tibetan antelope. It may be called “wool,” “mohair,” “pashmina,” or “cashmere.” But no matter what you call it, it means bad news for the animal it came from.

In the wool industry, just weeks after birth, lambs’ ears are punched, their tails are chopped off, and the males are castrated, all without anesthetics. To prevent “flystrike” (a maggot infestation caused by wrinkly skin, which was bred into the sheep so that they would have more wool), Australian ranchers perform a barbarous operation called “mulesing,” which involves carving huge strips of flesh off the backs of unanesthetized lambs’ legs.

Leather

Leather is not a slaughterhouse byproduct. It’s a booming industry, a driving force for the cattle industry, and it accounts for two-thirds of the value of the slaughtered cattle. Even the hides of “veal” calves are made into high-priced calfskin. The economic success of slaughterhouses and factory farms is directly linked to the sale of leather goods. Decreasing demand for both animal foods and leather products will result in fewer cows’ being factory-farmed.

Silk

Silk is the fiber that silkworms weave to make cocoons. To obtain silk, manufacturers boil worms alive in their cocoons.

Fur

Those who wear fur trim and fur coats have the blood of minks, raccoons, foxes, beavers, and other animals on their hands. Animals on fur farms spend their lives in tiny cages only to be killed by anal or genital electrocution, which causes them to have a heart attack. Some are skinned alive. Animals in the wild may languish for days in traps before they die or are killed.

Related posts:

1. There Is A price For A Life
2. PETA: Eva Mendes Speaks Out Against Wearing Fur
3. Johnson & Johnson: Stop animal testing!

“The animal must have been contaminated in some way,” said the country director of the Nature Conservation Germany (NABU), Wolfgang Mädlow, today to the AP. Continuing he says: “I’ve never seen or heard such a thing, although there is a white stork in Poland which, during the summer, is black because of the active fires and emitting black carbon“.

People in village speculate that the stork could have been sprayed as a April Fool’s joke, and other that it came from Africa to promote gay Football World Cup.

If it is a bad joke, or a coloring accident, the toxicity of the paint could endanger the life of the stork. For now, there are no signs that the stork is in life threating condition, it is building its nest as it should, carefree of the world around her.

Related posts:

1. Incredible Colors Of Nature
2. Rabbit Cruelty at ASU
3. Kung Fu Bear, Beat That Bruce Lee

Many non-animal methods are available to replace these cruel and outdated animal laboratories and have been shown to teach anatomy and physiology better than crude animal experiments.

Please take a minute of your time to urge Arizona State University to end these classroom animal experiments. Send an e-mail to Ernest Calderón, president of the Arizona Board of Regents, and politely ask him to replace these laboratories with some of the humane, non-animal teaching methods that are available and in use in physiology courses at other universities.

Calderon@azlex.com

Related posts:

1. Does Cruelty Free Mean Animal Free?
2. No More Animal Cruelty Videos?
3. Animal Cruelty, Watch How Pet Trade Supplier Treats Animals

India took the lead internationally last year when it stunned the zoo world by banning elephants in all zoos. Authorities cited problems common to most zoos, such as lack of space, poor breeding, and the absence of any positive effect on elephant conservation.

In contrast to India’s progressive leadership, North American zoos remain mired in the past, denying the devastating impacts of zoo captivity on elephants, sinking hundreds of millions of dollars into woefully inadequate exhibit renovations, and clinging to archaic and cruel circus-style training methods. The expert testimony in federal court of Mike Keele, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums’ elephant group head, on behalf of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus and its brutal elephant handling practices is a mark of just how out of step with progressive elephant care and advocacy most zoos have become.

“The Ten Worst Zoos for Elephants list shines a spotlight on the terrible suffering of elephants in zoos,” said IDA president Elliot Katz, DVM. “It’s time for North American zoos to join India in recognizing that Earth’s largest land mammals don’t belong in urban zoos which lack the space and complex natural conditions elephants need. Zoos must follow the lead of the two U.S. sanctuaries that provide elephants with vast acreage in natural habitats and a far superior quality of life.”

1.San Antonio Zoo (Texas) – Two’s really a crowd at this zoo -  What could be worse than displaying a solitary elephant? Answer: Confining two elephants in a pitifully small and unnatural exhibit that’s unfit for one, the mis-named Lucky. While keeping Lucky in solitary confinement for more than two years is incredibly cruel, acquiring another elephant for a still-inadequate “herd” of two is even worse. Elephants need room to roam as well as companionship. In the wild, these highly social animals live in large extended families that traverse enormous home ranges measuring hundreds of square miles, but the San Antonio Zoo would cram two elephants, who may or may not get along, into about half an acre. Adding to the ridiculous plan, the zoo intends to build a new exhibit for African elephants, so Lucky, and any other Asian elephant, would have to leave when it’s done. The San Antonio Zoo should retire Lucky – who has spent the last 47 years of her life on display – to a spacious, natural-habitat sanctuary that can far better meet her need for space and companionship. This is the San Antonio Zoo’s third appearance on IDA’s Ten Worst Zoos list; it holds the number one spot for the second straight year.

2.Toronto Zoo (Canada) – Deadliest zoo for elephants – Elephants are dying at an unprecedented rate at the Toronto Zoo. In less than four years, four elephants have died prematurely – two in 2009. None lived beyond age 40, even though elephants have a natural lifespan of 60-70 years. Their deaths corroborate the results of a 2008 study published in the journal Science showing that elephants in zoos die decades sooner than their counterparts in protected wild or semi-wild situations. It’s no surprise when you consider a zoo like Toronto, which lacks the space, natural conditions, and especially the climate elephants need to thrive. No amount of money the zoo spends in renovations (it’s proposing a $40 million overhaul) and no amount of care for the elephants can compensate for its inadequate conditions and frigid temperatures that force elephants indoors into tiny spaces during the long winter. The Toronto Zoo’s atrocious record of premature elephants deaths will only come to an end when it shuts down its elephant display. The Toronto Zoo’s appears for the first time on IDA’s Ten Worst Zoos for Elephants list.

3.Honolulu Zoo (Hawaii) -  No paradise for pachyderms – A Honolulu Zoo spokesman last year said that its elephants “are being cared for better than they would have been in their natural habitat.” We think the elephants Mari and Vaigai would vehemently disagree with that statement. Everything about the zoo’s antiquated elephant exhibit is wrong: it crams two of the world’s largest land mammals into a mere 6,000 square feet; lack of space for healthy movement is causing recurrent and painful foot disorders; keepers use circus-style training that relies on the use of cruel bullhooks; and it’s taken more than 10 years to renovate the exhibit – which still is not done and would provide not even an acre of space. Mari and Vaigai should be released to a sanctuary that can provide them with a good quality of life, not broken promises. This is the Honolulu Zoo’s first appearance on IDA’s Ten Worst Zoos for Elephants list.

4.Reid Park Zoo (Arizona) -  Time to ride off into the sunset – Several years ago, the zoo refused to relocate its elephants, Connie and Shaba, to a sanctuary, at no cost to the zoo or Tucson taxpayers. Instead, the zoo said it would build a new exhibit, to be funded in part by a multi-million dollar bond measure. Last week, the zoo announced that lack of funds has indefinitely postponed renovation of its tiny elephant exhibit, leaving Connie and Shaba stuck in a measly one-third of an acre yard. Both elephants suffer from health problems caused by horribly inadequate conditions. Connie has endured painful chronic foot abscesses since at least 1996. At one point, she had an infection in every nail on her feet. Shaba also has a history of foot disorders, which began shortly after she arrived at the zoo at age two. Foot disease is a common cause of death in captive elephants because they do not have the space they need for healthy movement and soft, natural surfaces that promote foot and joint health. A 2006 IDA survey found that 62 percent of elephants in U.S. zoos suffer foot disease, while 42 percent endure joint disorders. Abnormal behaviors such as Connie’s repetitive swaying only exacerbate these problems. Lack of space, the misery caused by foot disease, and the zoo’s failure to provide better conditions call for bringing an immediate end to the elephants’ suffering and the zoo’s elephant exhibit. This Reid Park Zoo appears for the first time on IDA’s Ten Worst Zoos for Elephants list.

5.Houston Zoo (Texas) -  You call this a conservation message? – At a time when Asian elephants are struggling to survive in the wild, the Houston Zoo should be sending the public a serious message that instills respect for this highly endangered species. Instead, in December the Houston Zoo chose cheap exploitation, putting a holiday wreath atop the elephant Methai’s head and offering $40 photo sittings with her. Rather than foster respect, the zoo showed that it’s okay to use an elephant as a prop for holiday greeting cards in a shameless photo op more appropriate for a roadside attraction than a major urban zoo. The public wouldn’t be quite so amused if they knew that Methai is subjected to cruel, circus-style training and controlled with a sharp steel bullhook to ensure she “behaves.” This frivolous photo op is even more inappropriate when you consider that the Houston Zoo is a deadly serious place for elephants, being a hot spot for a lethal elephant virus that claimed the lives of six elephants. None of the 14 elephants born at Houston are alive today. This is the Houston Zoo’s third appearance on IDA’s Ten Worst Zoos for Elephants list.

6.Topeka Zoo (Kansas) – Time for a fresh start – With last fall’s exposé of horrific animal deaths and the zoo director’s resignation, the spotlight is now on elephants Tembo and Sunda, who suffer chronic health problems, including serious foot disease, and display abnormal behaviors such as aggression and repetitive swaying. Sunda shows “deterioration of digits” (bones) in one front foot, a potentially fatal condition caused by lack of space and standing on hard surfaces. The elephants share less than three-quarters of an acre of space and are confined indoors in tiny stalls for long periods during Topeka’s long, frigid winters. (Wild elephants walk tens of miles a day and are active for 20 out of 24 hours in tropical climates.) A city spokesperson told the media: “The elephant yard is what it is… we’re providing the best exhibit that we can within the limited space that we have at that site.” When “the best we can” causes this kind of suffering, it isn’t nearly enough. The zoo must retire Tembo and Sunda to a spacious sanctuary, where conditions are far kinder for Sunda’s ailing feet and both elephants can live a life closer to what nature intended for them. The Topeka Zoo appears on IDA’s Ten Worst Zoos for Elephants list for the second time.

7.Oregon Zoo – Birds of a Feather Stick Together – Experts agree that elephants suffer in circuses, where they are cruelly controlled with a bullhook, a steel-tipped device similar to a fireplace poker used to prod, jab and beat elephants – including innocent babies – into compliance. But that didn’t stop deputy zoo director Mike Keele from testifying as a paid expert witness for Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus in a federal lawsuit over the circus’ inhumane practices. (The suit was dismissed without addressing the abuses.) Maybe that’s because the zoo uses the same circus method to control its elephants, even though this cruel method has been rejected by about half of U.S. zoos. By its very design, the bullhook is meant to cause pain and discomfort and its use is usually hidden from zoo-goers. In fact, while Oregon Zoo keepers trained the baby Samudra with the bullhook the windows in the elephant exhibit’s public viewing area reportedly were covered up. The zoo may be planning big changes to its elephant exhibit, supported by millions in taxpayer money, but until it ends the use of bullhooks it will never be humane for elephants. New director Kim Smith must take the zoo in a more progressive direction and end this disgraceful treatment of the elephants. The Oregon Zoo makes IDA’s Ten Worst Zoos for Elephants list for the third time.

8.Bronx Zoo (New York) – Never put off until tomorrow what you should do today – Four years ago, the Bronx Zoo announced plans to close its elephant exhibit when one or more of the inhabitants dies. The president of the Wildlife Conservation Society in charge of zoo operations cited elephants’ preference for herds of at least a half-dozen, and the difficulty of introducing unfamiliar elephants. Having acknowledged that the elephants’ needs are not being met, it is time to retire them now. Maxine, Patty and Happy – who are all nearing age 40 and have spent more than 30 years on display before the public – are held in conditions that fail to meet the needs of these tropical giants. This includes spending the better part of the freezing New York winter confined indoors, just so visitors can grab a brief glimpse of one or two of them (reportedly the elephants are not all exhibited together due to incompatibility) as they zoom past in a tram during warmer weather. ?Considering the zoo’s budget troubles that led to exhibit closures last year, it would be practical as well as humane to retire these elephants to a sanctuary now. The Bronx Zoo appears for the first time on IDA’s Ten Worst Zoos for Elephants list.

9.Toledo Zoo (Ohio) -The lonely life of bull elephants – “Baby” Louie, the Toledo Zoo’s star attraction, is about to get hit with the hard reality of a bull’s life in a zoo. The zoo is constructing a new barn for Louie, who turns seven this year, meaning that his days with mother Renee are numbered. While male elephants eventually leave their wild herds, it’s not until about age 14, and they are always in contact with other elephants. In zoos, males as young as one year old have been separated from their mothers and shipped to other facilities. Louie can expect what is standard for bull elephants in most zoos: a solitary life in a tiny exhibit, separated from other elephants except for breeding. If natural breeding does not work, he’ll become a sperm donor, constantly subject to invasive “extraction” procedures. While Louie presumably will stay in Toledo, that’s not true for other males born there in the future who would be “sold or loaned” to other facilities, according to the zoo. Young males need interaction with other elephants to ensure healthy social development, yet more than half of zoos with male elephants hold just one. In fact, the majority of zoos don’t hold bulls at all. Still, zoos continue to breed elephants even though it is creating a growing surplus of unwanted males. It’s a lonely life ahead for Louie. This is the Toledo Zoo’s first appearance on IDA’s Worst Zoos for Elephants list.

10.Brookfield Zoo (Illinois) – The replaceable Elephant – In most zoos, elephants are treated as interchangeable units – swapped, sold, loaned and replaced. Moves are not dictated by the elephants’ complex physical, psychological and social needs but by a zoo’s need to fill an open slot or add to its “collection.” After the deaths of two elephants last year, the Brookfield Zoo is again searching for a replacement elephant. Affie, who died just as she turned 40 (a natural lifespan for elephants is 60-70 years), was quickly replaced with Joyce as a cage-mate for the lone Christy. Then Christy died, leaving Joyce alone. The zoo intends to acquire yet another elephant, but is that really what’s best for Joyce? All this elephant has known in her life is upheaval – the traumatic separation from her wild family as a one year old, then being repeatedly shipped around the country for circus shows and failed breeding attempts. Her life is nothing like that of wild elephants, who enjoy family stability, with female offspring remaining with their mothers for life. Joyce deserves to live in a large social group, form lasting bonds with elephants whom she chooses, and enjoy year-round outdoor access in a spacious natural environment – something this zoo can’t give her but a sanctuary can. The Brookfield Zoo appears for the first time on IDA’s Ten Worst Zoos for Elephants list.

Related posts:

1. Circus Cruelty
2. Worst Oil Catastrophes Of All Time
3. Identify the Worst Polluter on the Planet

Since its inception the Foundation through its charter with the Courage House National Support Network for Kids, and an affiliation with the National Football League and Professional Football Athletics Trainers Society has helped to provide hope to countless children and raised millions of dollars.

The Ed Block Courage Award is named in honor of Ed Block, the longtime head athletic trainer of the Baltimore Colts who was a pioneer in his profession and a respected humanitarian.

In December members of the Eagles voted unanimously for Michael Vick to be the recipient of this years prestigious award. But one investigation showed something very disturbing!

Vick and two others strangled low performing dogs by hanging them from trees, drowning them in buckets of water — one person holding the hind legs, another person holding the dog’s head. They said Vick and two others also killed dogs with a shovel, shot them and in at least one case slammed a dog to the ground until it was dead.Vick and co-defendants Purnell Peace and Quanis Phillips “seemed to get an adrenaline high when killing the dogs,” an informant said.

An award of this caliber is intended to put the recipient in a place where he can give a voice to the voiceless. It’s intended to acknowledge a quality in human beings that we can all reach to attain. It was never intended to stroke the egos of hypocrites. Vick did exactly the type of thing Block took a stand against: abusing the weak and the innocent.

watch the video:

Related posts:

1. One Dog Policy In China
2. Piru Singh, India’s Bravest Hero